Skip to content
捐款支持事實查核
台灣事實查核學苑

ENGLISH

Facebook X Instagram YouTube Apple Podcasts Threads
看見真實,才能打造美好台灣
  • 最新消息
  • 查核報告
  • 謠言風向球
  • 議題觀察室
  • TOP10
  • 重點專區
  • 名家專欄
  • 國際視野
  • Podcast
Account 登入
English
捐款支持
看見真實,才能打造美好台灣

Disinformation campaign attacks media credibility

2022-04-222022-07-02 研究與動態

Since the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in late February, fact-checking organizations around the globe have cracked down on thousands of fake news and hoaxes spreading online as part of their joint efforts to contribute to the battle against disinformation campaigns. 

Among these organizations include Taiwan FactCheck Center. As of March 21, Taiwan FactCheck Center has debunked 31 false claims alone.

After reviewing these false claims, we have come to the conclusion that one common goal of such campaigns is to attack the credibility of the media.

In doing so, fake news spreaders are meant to discredit mainstream media and fact-checking organizations so that readers and viewers will no longer trust these credible news sources.

The three main approaches in their attack on media reports concerning the Russian invasion of Ukraine include accusing mainstream media of broadcasting fake news on the war; spreading fake fact-checking reports with the aim to make readers/viewers question the credibility of all fact-checking organizations and their reports; and finally by spreading half-truth fact-checking reports to attack the credibility of Taiwanese media.

One example of accusing mainstream media of spreading fake news is a rumor that has recently been debunked by Taiwan FactCheck Center; fake-news makers are using footage from a February 2022 climate policy demonstration held by the activist group “Fridays for Future” in Austria, in which protestors pretended to be dead bodies before they seemingly “came alive.”

The footage is being miscaptioned on social media by users who claim it shows “crisis actors” in Ukraine, accusing that actors are pretending to be victims in the Russian invasion, thus implying they are staged or fake.


Screenshot: Social media post claims that the footage shows “crisis actors” in Ukraine, accusing that actors are pretending to be victims in the Russian invasion.

Another example is using fake fact-checks to accuse mainstream media of spreading fake news.

One example sharing a fabricated story about a CNN journalist allegedly killed in Ukraine amid Russia’s recent invasion.

The posts are claiming CNN shared a tweet about the man’s death amidst the ongoing crisis in Ukraine after sharing the same story during the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan in August 2021.


Screenshot: Social media posts say CNN tweeted a fabricated story about a CNN journalist allegedly killed in Ukraine amid Russia’s recent invasion. 

But no such stories were posted by the news outlet and the screenshotted tweets come from unverified Twitter accounts posing as CNN pages.

It later turns out that the so-called CNN journalist was actually a YouTuber called Jordie Jordan.

A third widely used measure is to discredit Taiwanese media for making fake news and of doing nothing other than following American news reports.

Such rumors focus on spreading half-truth fact-checks in accusing Taiwanese media of spreading disinformation in an attempt to make local media reports not trustworthy.

In sum, the main purpose of such disinformation campaigns is an attempt to confuse and overwhelm people with a variety of fake news, rumors, and half-truth fact-checks, so that they decide to give up reading related news altogether and ultimately give up finding the truth.

The best way for the general public to win over such disinformation campaigns is to always remember to continue to obtain information concerning the topics they care about via a list of credible sources they established and continue to cross-examine all related information and sources to make sure they have access to the truth.

事實查核需要你的一份力量 捐款贊助我們

本中心查核作業獨立進行,不受捐助者影響。

事實查核需要你的一份力量 捐款贊助我們

本中心查核作業獨立進行,不受捐助者影響。

看見真實.打造美好台灣!

假新聞與假資訊破壞人類溝通最根本的真實原則,傷害民主運作最基礎的信賴原則,必須加以遏止,以免斲喪公共生活的品質。

02-2501 7010

[email protected]

  • 成立宗旨
  • 董事會
  • 組織架構
  • 查核團隊
  • 查核準則及說明
  • 捐款報告
  • 年度報告
  • IFCN的認證與申訴
  • 媒體報導
  • QA
© 2024 台灣事實查核中心 Taiwan FactCheck Center 更正政策 著作權聲明 隱私權政策

Scroll to top
Invalid search form.
聯絡我們

關於我們

  • — 成立宗旨
  • — 董事會
  • — 組織架構
  • — 查核團隊
  • — 查核準則及說明
  • — QA

支持事實查核

  • — 捐款報告
  • — 年度報告
舉報與申訴

  • 最新消息
  • 查核報告
  • 謠言風向球
  • 議題觀察室
  • TOP10
  • 重點專區
  • 名家專欄
  • 國際視野
  • Podcast
  • 台灣事實查核學苑
  • 關於我們
    • 成立宗旨
    • 董事會
    • 組織架構
    • 查核團隊
    • 查核準則及說明
    • QA
    • 捐款報告
    • 年度報告
    • IFCN認證與申訴
Account